Re: Using posix calls in rotor code

No - the critsec_count is internal to the PAL and is maintained
automatically for constructs like critical sections.
Barry 

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Archana
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Using posix calls in rotor code

>
> Be very careful adding new locks into the PAL - if you do, you'll need
> to update the critsec_count in order to avoid PAL-internal deadlocks.

if i add additional critical sections/mutexes in the /vm code, do i need
to update this critsec_count?

>
> Barry
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>

Regards,
archana