Re: Additional steps after authentication
Alex Ivanoff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
I thought about this. But it seems like a hack, plus we are not using session state. My other thought was to use UserData in FormsAuthenticationTicket to store some flag indicating that checks were successful. The I would check in Application_Authenticate request for this flag. Any comments on this approach? One thing that bothers me is that at some point I would have to override authentication ticket to change UserData. Can this screw up forms authentication infrastructure? Alex On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:50:39 +0100, Efran Cobisi <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I've had the very same problem in a web app some time ago. My solution >was to stay with FormsAuthentication but do not authenticate the user >until she completed the required checks; in that case, I stored a state >value in the user session, which basically would indicate that the user >has been already checked against username/password match but it has to >complete the aforementioned checks. Once the checks completed, I'd >authenticate the user within FormsAuthentication. > >HTH, > >Efran Cobisi >http://www.cobisi.com > >Alex Ivanoff wrote: >> I have an application using forms authentication with the following >> requirement. After user logs in the application needs to to perform some >> checks. If all checks are satisfied user is redirected to the original >> page she requested. If one or more checks fail user is redirected to other >> page to make some changes. After that checks are performed again until all >> of the ckecks are satisfied and user is redirected to the original page. >> What is the best way to accompish something like this? >> >> Thank you, >> Alex =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com