Re: sql server authentication with named domain account
Shawn Wildermuth <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:21:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pooling is supposed to be per Connection String (which would suppose that Integrated security would not cause fragmentation). If you want to test this, make sure you don't do it under the debugger as under the debugger pooling is disabled. I'd use Profiler and a test app to test it. I did this years ago when I wrote my book and it worked as expected, but that was under 1.0/1.1 not 2.0 or later. Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth http://adoguy.com http://wildermuthconsulting.com http://www.silverlight-tour.com Microsoft MVP (C#), MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker The Silverlight Tour is coming to a city near you! -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of building .NET applications targeted for the Web [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Aurit Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 9:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-WEB] sql server authentication with named domain account Which is what Id hoped would be the case. But the below MSDN article, under "Pool Fragmentation Due to Integrated Security", would seem to say the opposite; that the pool is at the individual user level and therefore not conducive to scalibility. In other words, the ado.net version of running under the user identity, which as you say its not a good thing. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8xx3tyca.aspx On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Mark Aurit <[email protected]> wrote: > (I posted this yesterday but it didnt come back. Since its of important > to me right now Im going to post it > again, sorry if you are getting it twice) > > Im creating an asp.net/sql server app; Id prefer to use a sql server > account to maximize connection pooling, our security guy wants > integrated security. We've reached an agreement where I can use a > single account as long as its a domain account, but Ive been unable to > figure out how to do so (if its even possible). Im thinking I either > need to use integrated security but force sql server to use a single > account, or use a regular connection string, naming the domain account > and password with Integrated Security=false. > Does want I want to do sound possible? > Thanks, Mark > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R) http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > -- ======================= [email protected] =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com