Re: sql server authentication with named domain account

Shawn Wildermuth <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:21:27 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.web
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Pooling is supposed to be per Connection String (which would suppose that
Integrated security would not cause fragmentation).  If you want to test
this, make sure you don't do it under the debugger as under the debugger
pooling is disabled.  I'd use Profiler and a test app to test it.  I did
this years ago when I wrote my book and it worked as expected, but that was
under 1.0/1.1 not 2.0 or later.

Thanks,

Shawn Wildermuth
http://adoguy.com
http://wildermuthconsulting.com
http://www.silverlight-tour.com
Microsoft MVP (C#), MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker

The Silverlight Tour is coming to a city near you!


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of building .NET applications targeted for the Web
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Aurit
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 9:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-WEB] sql server authentication with named domain
account

Which is what Id hoped would be the case.  But the below MSDN article, under
"Pool Fragmentation Due to Integrated Security", would seem to say the
opposite; that the pool is at the individual user level and therefore not
conducive to scalibility.  In other words, the ado.net version of running
under
the user identity, which as you say its not a good thing.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8xx3tyca.aspx

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Mark Aurit <[email protected]> wrote:

> (I posted this yesterday but it didnt come back.  Since its of important
> to me right now Im going to post it
> again, sorry if you are getting it twice)
>
> Im creating an asp.net/sql server app; Id prefer to use a sql server
> account to maximize connection pooling, our security guy wants
> integrated security.  We've reached an agreement where I can use a
> single account as long as its a domain account, but Ive been unable to
> figure out how to do so (if its even possible). Im thinking I either
> need to use integrated security but force sql server to use a single
> account, or use a regular connection string, naming the domain account
> and password with Integrated Security=false.
> Does want I want to do sound possible?
> Thanks, Mark
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R)  http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com
>



--

=======================
[email protected]

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com