Re: Forcing sub-classes to implement Constructor

Victor Grazi wrote:
> No I said "only a non-default constructor"
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From:  Randall R Schulz <[email protected]>
> Subj:  Re: [ADVANCED-JAVA] Forcing sub-classes to implement Constructor
> Date:  Thu Aug 9, 2007 7:10 pm
> Size:  1K
> To:  [email protected]
>
> On Thursday 09 August 2007 15:21, Victor Grazi wrote:
>
>> No but if you have only a non default constructor then subclasses are
>> forced to implement it.
>>
Actually I don't think thats true.

I *think* this is legal... though i haven't checked:

public class Foo {
   public Foo(String str){

  }
}

public class Bar {
    public Bar() {
       super("dummy");
   }
}

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com