Re: Puzzling class field initialization order
Carfield Yim <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.java.advanced |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> 3. S.IMPL = C.INSTANCE would trigger C loading, but C is already being > loaded, and INSTANCE is still null, so it is assigned null > ... Is it the specificed behaviour or it is just a bug of Sun JVM? As I application developer I wouldn't expect this at all... =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com