Re: Multiple returns vs. Single exit

Brian Maso <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:17:04 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.java.advanced
Message-ID <1020838733-1198876631-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-239333751-@bxe009.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
I think the important question for you to answer is: what is your company's stock symbol, so we can sell short!

A standard like that is the closest your sr. Devs can come to "marking" the codebase, since they can't actually piss on it. If you're up to it, I advise quietly going along with the standard, and backstabbing the idiot(s) who instituted it at the first solid oppotunity.

Brian Maso
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From:         Mark Gorokhov <[email protected]>

Date:         Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:47:14 
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-JAVA] Multiple returns vs. Single exit


Dmitry Beransky wrote:
> Does it have to be an "either-or" decision?  Whichever approach makes
> the code more readable in a given situation is the one you should use.

There is no "either-or" in our coding standards. We must use a single
return, no Hungarian notation (but "m_" is mandated), and so on.

We are reworking old code to meet our new coding standards.

Mark G.

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com