Re: java serialization alternative
Jeffrey Kesselman <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:48:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.java.advanced |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bob Lee wrote: > Rodrick, you might be interested in Protocol Buffers. We just open sourced > them: http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/ > Oh boy. yet another serialization 'standard'... add it to the list with YAML I guess. Standards? You want standards? We got LOTS of standards... > Compared to serialization, PBs will make your system more efficient and more > maintainable. > > Bob > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Rodrick Brown <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> Do any of you guys have experience with Java serialization and what >> kind of overheads it causes? As far as I know, it produces very large >> messages and is not particularly fast, so I am concerned about that >> given that it is pervasively used in our system core for sending >> messages between daemons over our messaging API. >> >> One possible alternative is http://xstream.codehaus.org/ which can be >> tuned to produce fairly small messages (by aliasing class names and >> types for example). However, I have no sense of the speed. I will >> do some performance tests. >> >> Comments, questions, etc? >> >> >> -- >> [ Rodrick R. Brown ] >> http://www.rodrickbrown.com >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/rodrickbrown >> >> =================================== >> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R) http://www.develop.com >> >> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at >> http://discuss.develop.com >> >> > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com > =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com