Re: Branched 1.x and checked in a lot of refactoring

Hi Morten,

I am happy with changes to the XSL stylesheets that progress them, the type
browser was implemented without too much knowledge of native bridging (or
jawin for that matter) on my behalf.

I am aware that in their current state the stylesheets are barely stubs in
some areas.

Additionally, I am very busy with 3 other projects and can't really
contribute to jawin immediately.

I really appreciate that you are progressing these, I was hoping that
someone with real jawin expertise would fill these out one day :op

Josh


>From: Morten Andersen <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
><[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [JAWIN] Branched 1.x and checked in a lot of refactoring
>Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:26:02 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from discuss.develop.com ([66.129.110.38]) by mc4-f31.hotmail.com
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:27:28 -0700
>Received: from develop-lserv (66.129.110.38) by discuss.develop.com (LSMTP
>for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[email protected]>; Mon,
>14 Jun 2004 17:13:31 -0400
>Received: from DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM by DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
>         release 1.8e) with spool id 582318 for [email protected];
>         Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:13:31 -0400
>Received: from sloth.intern.arosii.com (130.228.101.222) by
>discuss.develop.com          (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
>     <[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:13:30 -0400
>Received: from arosii.dk ([192.168.1.3]) by sloth.intern.arosii.com
>  (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5ELQ0Vo022891 for
><[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:27:00 +0200
>X-Message-Info: UZmYcfFpTCcodmHSghhhs8MrtbY8jwxI
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6)
>    Gecko/20040113
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, da
>X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0
>X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
>X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.68-1, clamav-milter version 0.67a
>Message-ID:  <[email protected]>
>Organization: Arosii Information Systems A/S
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: [email protected]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 21:27:28.0781 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[64F74BD0:01C45256]
>
>Hi all
>
>I finally made the branch for the old Jawin 1.x code (called jawin_1x).
>
>Besides that I checked in a bunch of changes on the now unstable CVS
>HEAD (please see the top of the docs/jawinrevisions.html-file for the
>most notable changes).
>
>The junit-test target should work now, and I would like to hear if any
>of you have success in running the unit-tests (after setting up junit in
>Ant - should be handled by copying junit.jar to ant-home/lib). It should
>be as simple as running:
>        ant test
>and then afterwards check the test-reports in:
>        dist/test-reports
>
>I have also made a few changes to the typebrowser code/xsl, that I am a
>little unsure of, namely support for VT_PTR's to dispatch interfaces. I
>have not tested this very throughfully, and I hope that Josh and Roger
>(you are probably the guys, that are experts on this area), could verify
>whether my changes in:
>        stylesheets/codegen/jawin/dispatch.xsl
>and
>        src/org/jawin/browser/typelib/TypeParser.java
>are correct.
>
>Oh, and then I started on documenting in details the usage of COMPtr,
>FuncPtr and DispatchPtr, please see the docs-folder (but this is far
>from finished yet). I have not yet gotten around to document in details
>the usage of the out-wrapper object for [out]-parameters in dispatch
>interfaces (if anybody really needs this documented right now, please
>say so, and I will prioritize it).
>
>I don't hope I have broken to much :-)
>
>Best Regards
>Morten

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail