Re: JVM access violation in Type Browser
Roger I Martin PhD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.jawin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I do think it would be good if I went thru the typelib native code I wrote and apply exception handling I learned from Robert... Morten Andersen wrote: > Hi John > > John Pompeii wrote: > >> Using VC++, I extracted the IDL from the offending DLL and created a >> typelib from it. The Type Browser liked that and is generated the >> code for >> it. > > > Good to hear. > >> I'll take your advice though and get the source and latest docs. Have >> there been alot of bug fixes since the last build up on sourceforge? > > > Mostly refactoring and additional docs. We will probably make some > "breaking changes" in the coming release(s). But as for specific bugs, > the following is a raw list of whats in the jawinrevisions-doc for the > next release: > - a lot of issues with safearrays resolved. > - support for VT_DATE finished. > - better support for out-parameters in Dispatch calls. > - a thorough cleaning of the Variant marshalling code on both the Java > and the native side. > - the refactoring includes stuff like: > - removing the last traces of the old com.develop-branch. > - updated the unit tests. > - moved some non-jawin core classes out into a separate > stubs-tree (no > make it simpler to get a grasp of Jawin). > - a lot of additional Javadoc. > > Hope this convinces you to use the CVS-branch :-) > > Best Regards > Morten >