Re: Why JCOM, JACOB and JAWIN?

Robert Hastings <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.jawin
Message-ID <JAWIN%[email protected]>
OK, I'll throw in here. There's actually another, jSegue on sourceforge. Why
yet another one? The COM server we needed to integrate with required vtable
bindings. Some of the other COM bridges only bridge through IDispatch. It
reduces that amount of JNI coding that has to get generated.

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kai Klesatschke
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [JAWIN] Why JCOM, JACOB and JAWIN?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Vitaly Shelest(home) wrote:
| Somebody wants to sell, others publish.
| Read about IBM and J-Integra COM bridges.

I know these solutions already. But I wanted to start a discussion about
the three open source projects on SourceForge! BTW J-Integra for COM
works very well but I'm afraid it is to expensive for us.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCWpMho6yr2Zy87e4RAk+dAJ9uDs2/gz/mIrYImynq4KVJresOcgCeKcBM
qna3nqBVyu+nQR39Nknlbhc=
=77vd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.