Re: Why JCOM, JACOB and JAWIN?
"Vitaly Shelest(home)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.jawin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000e01c53ff4$7a31eeb0$660fa8c0@vitallis> |
The main problem of jSegue C++ Wrappper Gen. is that it is written in java. And if it uses Reflection to parse a java class it would the worst idea. Because not all classes can be loaded with Class Loader (classes with native methods, or they use Security Manager, etc.). The code in C++ generated is half-finished. So JAWIN's idea is better. Try to debug it as me. ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Hastings Newsgroups: gmane.comp.windows.devel.jawin Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:33 AM Subject: Re: Why JCOM, JACOB and JAWIN? Actually, I did signup as a developer on jawin, but since it does not meet all of my requirements I end up spending most of my time on jSegue. Robert -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kai Klesatschke Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [JAWIN] Why JCOM, JACOB and JAWIN? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello maintainers, during my inquiry for Java-Com-Bridges I found almost 3 projects on SourceForge they are dealing with the same issue. IMHO all three projects have the same problem. Less maintainers and the status of development does not meet MY and maybe others requirements. Immediately I had an idea, why not pulling the projects together? Greetings Kai -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCWoXRo6yr2Zy87e4RAj3GAKDCcPRtDsgeiaUTyFqwkK50FNHb4ACffVA+ kp4QKph6AwxhVAWfUgxpUFE= =clKk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----