Re: status of nio version
Roger I Martin PhD <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jun 2005 06:23:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.jawin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Christophe, A set of interfaces will be added. Possibly for the current as well as the new nio based marshaling. I'm not big on having xxxxxImpl (which would require current class names be changed) all over the place. What would be another acceptable way? Put the interface in one deeper folder as in org.jawin.interface.IDispatch or org.jawin.IDispatchInterface? I'm out for two days, Roger Christophe Warland (FRSGlobal) wrote: >Sounds nice, thank you for be willing to do all that work! > >One extra refactoring feature I'd like to ask for is to make it so that all >methods in COMPtr and DispatchPtr are declared in a separate interface that >would be implemented by instances of those classes. It would allow me to >develop some nifty Java Dynamic Proxies on top of. Today, I have to do some >advance java.reflect tricks to do what regular proxies could do out of the >box with interfaces. > >Thanks! > >-- Christophe > > > >