Re: cvs layout for new development?
Morten Andersen <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:11:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.jawin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Roger,
1) First the minor changes. I just think you should commit these in
HEAD. Then there are a little less to worry about :-). You should
probably also add a new section in the top of the docs/jawinrevisions
for "Version 2.0, alpha 2", and add a description of these changes (it
is at least my experience, that if I do not add them immediately after
commit'ing the changes, I forgot to list them in the revision history).
2) A scratch pad. I haven't seen that before, but I assume you e.g. mean
a brand new folder here:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jawinproject/
Is the intention of a scratch pad, then to delete it after the ideas in
it are added to the HEAD, or being tested and found not suitable? Or is
the scratch pad a separate kind of development branch?
2a) Another option is to create a separate branch for it, and then we
can either later merge with the HEAD or just let the branch "die" if we
decide to. If you use WinCVS, I think the steps for this are as follows
(I assume your checked out HEAD is heavely modified, so I will try to
describe it the "safe" way with a new parallel checkout - there may be
easier ways to perform some of the steps? - before you do anything, you
should of course take a backup of your local changes just in case
somethings goes wrong):
a) Check out the clean HEAD into a new directory.
b) Create a branch on the clean HEAD, name it e.g. "nio_refactor", or
whatever you find appropriate.
c) Your working copy of HEAD (from step a) will NOT be on the branch,
so I suggest you delete it again, and do a new check out, where you
select to check out the branch "nio_refactor" (I think that if you are
in doubt what you are working on, wincvs shows the branch-name in the
tag-column in the file-explorer).
d) Now to the "hard" part (actually it shouldn't be that hard): Copy
your locally modified files and new files from your locally modified
HEAD-folder into the branch-checkout-folder. Note: I think you can NOT
copy entire folders, as this will overwrite the CVS-control files too,
so you will have to copy files individually.
e) Finally (after everything compiles and works as expected again), you
can commit the changes in the branch-checkout folder. After this you
should delete your modified HEAD checkout folder (but of course keep
your backup :-)).
I hope my "reciept" is possible to understand? If you are working with
e.g. Eclipse instead of WinCVS, you can consult a page like this:
http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-CVS-branching/eclipse_branch.html
I am looking forward to seing your proposal for a new marshalling
mechanism (I can not promise it, but if time and weather (the sun is
shining way more than usual in Denmark pt. so I find it a little hard to
spend entire weekends inside with the PC :-)) allows it, I will
hopefully look on it in the weekend, if it is possible for you to check
in before that - but don't stress for my sake).
Best Regards and good luck, with whatever decision you take
Morten
Roger I Martin PhD wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> I was out for a week for a customer. You're probably busy too. Any
> thoughts on layout of cvs? some people make a scratch pad. I am
> working with new cpp source files like OleControlStub.cpp instead of
> changing the current GenericStub. All different stylesheets too. Some
> of the minor changes in the TypeLib Browser are good for current and new
> development.
>
> -Roger
>