Re: VT_BSTR keeps printing to System out, any ideas why?

Sorry, I got mixed up in the who's who list.

Regards,

-- C.

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Hastings
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VT_BSTR keeps printing to System out, any ideas why?

Roger is working on the new marshalling code fro jawin 2.0? Not sure which
Robert you are referring?

Have a nice day,
Robert Hastings

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christophe Warland
(FRSGlobal)
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [JAWIN] VT_BSTR keeps printing to System out, any ideas why?

Robert,

Is the "jawin 2.0" initiative eventually going to have the new marshalling
code that you are working on? Or is this "2.0" only for new code generation
-- which is fine by me since I always use put/get/invoke directly -- ?

Thanks!

Regards,

-- Christophe

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger I Martin PhD
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VT_BSTR keeps printing to System out, any ideas why?

Tom Malia wrote:

>Yes on the package org.jawin
>
>The "alpha1" in the name is a little scary to me, the "2" in the version
>number is encouraging...
>
>
The alpha stuff is in the code generation side.  The marshaling didn't
change except for fixes.

>Is this "alpha" version stable enough for a production environment?  Where
>do I down load it?  Will I need to build from source?  I'm an Ant Newbie.
>In fact I'm a newbie for about a half dozen different technologies on this
>project (SOAP, Web services, Java/COM integration, Tomcat...)  Don't really
>want to have to learn yet another new thing like Ant right now if I don't
>have to.
>
>
Be cautious using jawin where you expect callback and event handling.
Or visual rendering(i.e. JAWT). These features aren't supported that I
can see.
You should not need to compile anything.  And if you get it out of cvs
you only need to run the script for compiling the java side.  The native
dlls are in cvs precompiled.

>By the way.... THANKYOU for your help and for this REALLY nice tool... It
>appears you're the driving force behind Jawin these days... is that
correct?
>
>
Not as much as I would like to.  Hopefully this winter I make some
progress.  I wasn't around for the initial marshaling.  I am
experimenting with a new way to marshal.  And event handling and jawt
visual display of visual COM components.  These experiments use little
of the original code and are not ready to reside in cvs.  Having
difficulties with the MS Platform SDK on different Windows versions.
And finding my way thru their documentation.

>If I can contribute anything to the effort eventually I would certainly
like
>to do so.
>
>
I would appreciate anything that come about.

>Regards,
>Tom Malia
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger I Martin PhD
>Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 4:10 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [JAWIN] VT_BSTR keeps printing to System out, any ideas why?
>
>Tom Malia wrote:
>
>
>
>>The readme file says it's Version 1.0.19
>>
>>
>>
>>
>You may want the Jawin-2.0-alpha1. You are using package org.jawin?
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Discussion of Java/Win32/COM integration with Jawin
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger I Martin PhD
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:16 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [JAWIN] VT_BSTR keeps printing to System out, any ideas why?
>>
>>Which version do you have?
>>Tom Malia wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Evertime a call is made to a JAWIN function, it appears to be printing
the
>>>string "VT_BSTR" to system out.
>>>
>>>I search my own code for some debuging System.out.println call that I
>>>
>>>
>might
>
>
>>>have made but found none.  Anyone have any idea why I'm getting this
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>behavior?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>