Re: My wishlist
Alex Russell <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Jan 2004 02:11:56 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.netwindows |
|---|---|
| Organization | netWindows.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 30 January 2004 12:54 am, Kirk Daries wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still a newbie to netWindows, but not to DHtml programming. > Well.... I'm a amateur at that too! ;) > > >>It's slow to load, and doesn't move well on the screen. > > As to moving a window.... > I've seen a few examples on the net, display the outline of a > window instead of showing the actual window moving around. > Alternatively, when a user holds the mouse down (whilst moving a > window) on the 'Title Bar', one could hide the 'Contents window'. > Better yet, make it a property of the window widget instead of the > default behaviour(with optional global properties for all windows). The speed of dragging is currently directly related to the complexity of the contents of the window. There are several ways of speeding this up which don't involve what I consider to be hacks (such as dragging an outline, and then the contents). > Speaking about windows.... > Here's my wish list....well, from what I've seen in the > window_test.html example. > > We need a taskbar to show all open windows that have been > minimized. That way windows, can actually disappear...... title bar > and all (And save space to boot). > If the developer doesn't want to use the taskBar (Ie, it takes up > too much realestate) netWindows can always revert to the current > implementation. Ugg. I don't like (and have never liked) the concept of a task-bar for a web browser. We aren't building OSes here, we're building single applications. Doing more than that blurs the lines in ways that NW isn't designed to deal with (yet). > I like the current implementation of the windows. > E.g. > Take 2 windows. Click on one. It's pops to the top. Click on the > other, it pops to the top. > That's all well and good in a number of circumstances. But we > should have other behaviours as well. > > Take the case we I want to display 4 or 5 little windows on a > screen. One displaying a tree, the others detail screens. Here's > how I'd like to see them behave. > - Windows should know about their own space. If 2 windows are on > the same zOrder, they shouldn't be able to overlap each other. In > other words, they should be able to move freely in open space, but > not over other windows. I'm not aware of any window manger of any type that supports such a "bump mode". Where would this be useful? > - Maximizing should only maximize to the avaible open space. > Minimizing to the titleBar(or taskBar) is fine. > - Urrmm.... Make them 'stick' to each other ala winamp! ;) (ok... > that's more a nice to have !) There was a gravity feature at one point, but if it's going to be re-done, it would have to be a global option for draggable items. Is this a big deal for your application? Regards - -- Alex Russell [email protected] BD10 7AFC 87F6 63F9 1691 83FA 9884 3A15 AFC9 61B7 [email protected] F687 1964 1EF6 453E 9BD0 5148 A15D 1D43 AB92 9A46 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFAGi3toV0dQ6uSmkYRAlMcAKCoqvvx99FQbRqR6lVuJibP5sj8HwCeNgwz tfedOPeLT8fta12vt/Yg/+c= =stug -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ The netWindows developers list: [email protected] http://netwindows.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_netwindows.org