Re: Questions about netwindows, probably a faq
Alex Russell <[email protected]> Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:06:47 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.netwindows |
|---|---|
| Organization | netWindows.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Austin, On Sunday 04 April 2004 11:45 am, Austin Schutz wrote: > Ok, I did actually read the faq first, I think you're the first person ever = ) > but here are a couple > questions I'm hoping to find answers for: > > Is netwindows in cvs somewhere accessible? Yes. Our CVS is hosted on SourceForge. Since SourceForge CVS for anonymous users is lame, we've setup a user called "sfsucks" which has read-only perms on the "live" version of our CVS instead of the 12-hour delayed version. http://sf.net/cvs/?group_id=20631 Use username "sfsucks" and password "anonymous". > The mailing list archive link is broken from the mailing list web > page. Is there a working link to the archive somewhere? Thanks for the head's up. It looks pretty borken right now. I'll see what I can do. > How does netwindows compare in functionality to other dhtml > toolkits, such as activeui/activewidgets? I hadn't really looked at activewidgets, but it's interesting to see another toolkit taking our on-load parsing idea and running with it almost in parallel to our work. This toolkit looks new-ish. Do you know the people behind it? Do they have widgets beyond this grid thing? As for how we compare to other toolkits, we are DOM-based (no NN4 support) and the guiding philosophy for the toolkit is to help the browser out where the browser can't do something itself. This means we attempt to avoid duplicating functionality where possible and we try to support standards in principle wherever it makes sense. We've done a lot of work to support "degradeable DHTML" and the toolkit has been designed to be easily useable for both developers and end users. I think all of those things make us very different from many of the other toolkits you'll find. As for raw number of widgets, I don't think we're the most capable in that regard, but we're getting there. > Do you have a favorite debugging tool? Mozilla's Venkman and our own __log__ object. > Anyway, I'm really excited about netwindows, it's exactly what > I've been looking for to solve several of my web programming > annoyances. I'm hoping to be able to contribute a litle development > time on it. There are lots of places where we can use help. If you want suggestions for places where we can use assistance, just send me mail privately ([email protected]). Regards - -- Alex Russell [email protected] BD10 7AFC 87F6 63F9 1691 83FA 9884 3A15 AFC9 61B7 [email protected] F687 1964 1EF6 453E 9BD0 5148 A15D 1D43 AB92 9A46 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFAcHjooV0dQ6uSmkYRAj90AKDTbkUnvZXkKrn0YXIZ51JOSUTnSwCfQnG2 nuh3o1P3PyLO3gr87rbuz2M= =zluA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ The netWindows developers list: [email protected] http://netwindows.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_netwindows.org