Re: doc-literal v/s rpc-encoded
Matt Long <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Phalanx Systems, LLC |
| Message-ID | <000601c231ea$40062cd0$3cfff6d0@gulag> |
e.g., Purchase Order, Invoice, HIPAA Transactions, EDI2XML, etc., etc. -Matt Long Phalanx System, LLC > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of implementing SOAP applications today > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam T > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [SOAP] doc-literal v/s rpc-encoded > > I was trying to think of the use cases where one would prefer > to use document-literal over rpc encoded and drew a blank. > > Can anyone highlight why an application would choose > document-literal or rpc-literal as the message format ? > > What would such a use case look like ? > > Thanks > /s > > You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or > subscribe to other > DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.