Re: soap encoding
Matt Long <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Phalanx Systems, LLC |
| Message-ID | <002d01c23c7b$a9a7ddf0$3cfff6d0@gulag> |
+1 I can't imagine a case whereby doc/encoded | rpc/lit become a norm. Only doc/lit + rpc/encoded have been tested on an interop basis, i.e., the focus of vendors and/or other interested parties. Thx, -Matt Long Phalanx Systems, LLC Rosimildo wrote: > --- Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yep. > > > > I was looking for doc/encoded or rpc/literal > > > I believe that in reality, these two are > NEVER going to be used anywhere, except > someone proving that they exist. > You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.