Re: SOAP performance data and open benchmarks
Bob Maccione <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree that compression is a great thing, the problem that we are having is that .net doesn't support http compression, even though the browser does. This is told to me by MS consultants since I was sending stuff to them compressed (and it made a big difference for me) but they couldn't decompress the stream.. bobm > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 02:23:40 -0400 > From: Phil Troy <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: SOAP performance data and open benchmarks > > Hi! > > One fo the responses to the question about performance indicated that XML= > > was necessarily (much) slower because of the increased size of the > messages. > > Would the difference be significantly decreased if compression were used,= > > particularly with arrays where the same keywords may be used very > frequently in the message. Furthermore, if the compression were built in= > to > the xml text generation, might not the processing time to create the > compressed message be very significantly reduced? > > Phil Troy > > Philip M. Troy, Ph.D. > TROYWARE > Montreal, Quebec > 514-481-9166 > [email protected] > [email protected] = > > You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.