Re: Binary XML serialization
Robin Berjon <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:40:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Expway |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Doug Ransom wrote: > I have not looked in WBXML in any detail. Why is it horrible? "Horrible" might have been slightly exaggerated :) Lets just say that it's simplistic and has many limitations. It also doesn't necessarily encode that well. It isn't made to scale well, or to encode complex vocabularies. If you want to get a better idea, you can have a quick read of http://www.w3.org/TR/wbxml/, it's a really short Note. Caveat: I work on producing XML encodings, I'm naturally biased :) -- Robin Berjon <[email protected]> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488 You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.