Re: Alternate encodingStyle?

Hi,

It must also be pointed out that the use of the encodingStyle
attribute is optional, and "no claims" means "reader makes right",
not necessarily that no encoding was used. In the past I've
suggested that the use of encodingStyle be mandatory to simplify
receiver processing, but it's still a MAY in SOAP 1.2.

RC

> I have a point of confusion around Example 17 in the SOAP 1.2 Primer
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/#L3374).  Why doesn't the env:Body
> element have an encodingStyle attribute with the
> value "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"?  Is this an error in
> Example 17?
>
> It seems to conflict with the following statement from Part 1: 5.1.1 SOAP
> encodingStyle Attribute (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-
> 20020626/#soapencattr), "If no encodingStyle attribute information item is
> in scope for a particular element information item or the value of such an
> attribute information item is the zero-length URI ("") then no claims are
> made regarding the encoding style of that element information item and its
> descendants."
>
> Thank you,
> Don Smith
>
> You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other
> DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other
DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.