Re: Is there a future for RPC style SOAP?

Did you mean that Section 5 encoding is not supported.  Section 5.3
specificallly mentions both Document and RPC styles.  However, it only
refers to literal encoding (use = "literal").

Piotr Prussak wrote:

>It seems that RPC style is not being supported according to ws-basic
>profile:
>http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2002-10/BasicProfile-1.0-WGD.htm
>
>It just happens that Tim Ewald wrote his piece a week before the draft
>was released, and he was probably very influential to this profile in
>the first place.
>
>Piotr Prussak
>[email protected]
>
>Office: (973) 812-9691
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christophe Herreman [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:19 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [SOAP] Is there a future for RPC style SOAP?
>
>
>Hello,
>
>Tim Ewald from Microsoft wrote an illuminating article on why SOAP
>encoding has no future in web services.
>
><http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
>us/dnsoap/html/argsoape.asp>
>
>But what about RPC style?
>
>Is there a future for RPC in web services? As web services are also
>increasing used for intra-enterprise applications there is a clear need
>for a standardized, cross-platform way of invoking remote procedure
>calls.
>
>br.
>
>You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or
>subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>
>You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other
>DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>

You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other
DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.