Re: Is there a future for RPC style SOAP?
Anne Thomas Manes <[email protected]> Sat, 7 Dec 2002 08:16:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:35:27 -0000 > From: "GOFFIN, Fraser" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Is there a future for RPC style SOAP? > > <snip> > So, despite the fact that RPC/Encoded is commonly used today I for > one will not implement anything further using SOAP encoding. This still > leaves the fact that there are some circumstances where implementing RPC > style exchange could be of use. Unfortunately there is little tool support > RPC/Literal so I guess its Doc/Lit only going forward ? > > Fraser. > I'm not sure I really see much value for the SOAP RPC structure if you're not using SOAP encoding. If you're not using SOAP encoding, then the only difference between RPC and Document style formats is that the RPC message is wrapped in an element that represents the method name. There are other ways to indicate the method you'd like to perform (e.g., the target URI, or the SOAPAction header). What circumstances were you thinking of where it could be of use? Anne You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.