Re: rpc/literal

You can do this in .NET. Yasser Shohoud wrote the following article on
MSDN:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=3D/library/en-us/dnwebs=
r
v/html/rpc_literal.asp


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of implementing SOAP applications today
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Johansen
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SOAP] rpc/literal

In this article:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=3D/library/en-us/dnsoap=
/
html/understandsoap.asp

the author makes the quote, "Rpc/literal [is] possible but [it doesn't]
make much sense"

Can someone expand on why that is the case? I have a vendor who
currently is exposing an rpc/literal Web service that I obviously can't
generate proxy classes from in .NET and I am trying to make a case to
them as to why it would be beneficial to move to Document/literal going
forward.

Thanks,

Paul