Re: Nant VS CC.NEt
Chris Howell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nant.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <954C87AAC77A2E4392BBBA3F0B9F3D4402CFA8EED708@p01adm01.ad.padresoft.com> |
Ok perhaps I should have phrased my question a little better, I am looking for CI and daily builds. I've used CC.Net before exclusively without NANT. My question was more why would I choose to use the functionality exposed in NANT, such a executing tasks, copying files etc.... When CC.NET also has utilities for doing the same thing ? There seems to be quite a bit of over lap between the tasks that CC.Net can don and the tasks that NANT can do. Therefore what is the benefit ? Of combining the two ? From: Stephan King [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:56 PM To: Chris Howell Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt You don't choose one over the other, they go hand in hand. CC.NET will handle all of your source control operations, scheduling, emailing, publishing, etc, and CC.NET will call into your NANT scripts to do things like run MSBuild, copy files, etc. Stephan From: Chris Howell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt Hi All, I am looking to introduce a Continuous Integration/build environment to my dev team which currently has none. What would be the primary advantage(s) to choosing a NANT too over CC.NET ? Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ NAnt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users