Re: Thoughts on moving NAnt to git

Brass Tilde <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nant.devel,gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nant.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm not a developer on the project, so my opinion doesn't really count, nor
frankly do I have an opinion either way anyway, but why would you suggest a
change?  Aside from any personal preferences you may have, what would the
*project* gain from such a switch, and why would that make changing
worthwhile?

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ryan Boggs <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Guys,
>
> How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git?  Do you guys think that
> it would be a welcome change?
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
> The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly
> Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
> across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.