Re: Thoughts on moving NAnt to git
Markus Ewald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nant.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/17/2010 4:01 PM, Markus Ewald wrote: > On 10/17/2010 3:21 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote: >> Hey Guys, >> >> How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git? Do you guys think that >> it would be a welcome change? >> > Is there any Problem we're having that git would solve? > I hear that git does faster branching/merging, but afaik the NAnt > repository is not a heavy user of those features, if at all. > In retrospect, I just noticed that NAnt uses CVS (I thought it was Subversion). Based on CVS' non-existent changeset support and the fact that it's getting harder by the minute to find someone who willingly has CVS on his system, I'd actually be in favor of moving :) When were you planning the move (if there was a consensus)? After the 0.91 release? -Markus- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev