Re: Thoughts on moving NAnt to git

Ron Grabowski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nant.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Definitely something other than CVS. SVN seems to be a good enough SCM that a 
lot of people are familiar with. I doubt people will be doing large 
branches/merges to warrant getting into git. I wrote a little patch for nant a 
while ago and would probably do a few more minor minor things if the code was in 
something other than cvs.


----- Original Message ----
From: Ryan Boggs <[email protected]>
To: Markus Ewald <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, October 17, 2010 7:40:27 PM
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Thoughts on moving NAnt to git

Hi,

On Oct 17, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Markus Ewald <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 10/17/2010 4:01 PM, Markus Ewald wrote:
>>   On 10/17/2010 3:21 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> Hey Guys,
>>> 
>>> How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git?  Do you guys think that
>>> it would be a welcome change?
>>> 
>> Is there any Problem we're having that git would solve?
>> I hear that git does faster branching/merging, but afaik the NAnt
>> repository is not a heavy user of those features, if at all.
>> 
> In retrospect, I just noticed that NAnt uses CVS (I thought it was 
> Subversion).
> Based on CVS' non-existent changeset support and the fact that it's 
> getting harder by the minute to find someone who willingly has CVS on 
> his system, I'd actually be in favor of moving :)
> 
Yeah, that's one of the main reasons for this question right there. :)

There use to be a link for an svn repo in NAnt's SF site but it wasn't used as a 
primary, so it was removed awhile back.  That may have been a source of 
confusion.  We've been using cvs ever since I joined the project.

If we were using svn today, I don't think I would be considering git right now.  
And I suggested git because I have been using it lately for personal projects 
and I like it.  Its easy for me to use on both *nix and Windows platforms.  
Plus, it seems to be popular with other open source projects.
> When were you planning the move (if there was a consensus)? After the 
> 0.91 release?
> 
Yeah, I was thinking of sometime after 0.91 final is released.  It's good to ask 
around for opinions now though. 

> -Markus-
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
> The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
> Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
> across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> NAnt-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Thanks,
Ryan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
NAnt-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.