Re: About the Wiki

"James Kovacs" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nhibernate.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I agree with Pierre Henri. Having the wiki be an editable version of the
NHibernate docs would lower the bar for people contributing to the
documentation. This would be a good thing. A quick Google revealed
DocBookWiki, which is wiki software specifically designed to display and
edit DocBook online. Rather than bulk importing/exporting DocBook->HTML,
DocBookWiki does it on the fly and stores its content in DocBook format.

http://doc-book.sourceforge.net/homepage/

It sounds promising, but I've only read the intro page and not actually
tried it out.

Personally I think that:

http://docs.nhibernate.org

would be a lot easier to remember than:

http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/nhibernate/1.2/reference/en/html_single/

IMHO I think docs.nhibernate.org makes more sense than wiki.nhibernate.org.
Wiki is an implementation detail. Docs describes what it is.

James
--
James Kovacs, B.Sc., M.Sc., MCSD, MCT
Microsoft MVP - C# Architecture
http://www.jameskovacs.com
[email protected]
403-397-3177 (mobile)

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Pierre Henri Kuaté <[email protected]> wrote:

> We had a wiki a while ago (Confluence IIRC), but after the merging with
> hibernate.org, most of its articles where integrated in the current
> documentation.
>
> There are basically two options to start using one again:
> - (Continue to) use the current Hibernate wiki. Yes, there is one :) But it
> doesn't contain much NHibernate material.
> - Install our own wiki at either nhibernate.sourceforge.net or
> wiki.nhibernate.org (that's where the old one was).
> As far as I am concerned each of these options have their pros and cons:
> Using the Hibernate wiki would allow a better integration of the
> documentation (one website with everything). Hosting the wiki separately
> would allow choosing the software we want...
>
> One of the main action aside for hosting the wiki is putting some content
> in it since an empty wiki can be quite intimidating. Also, it seems that
> many would like to have the same documentation they have in the reference in
> that wiki (so that they can quickly edit it). This will also require some
> work to port the DocBook version to the wiki and keep them in sync (ie: port
> the edits back to the DocBook version).
>
> Something that could ease and speed up that process would be to have a wiki
> that support import/export from/to DocBook. I quickly googled it and it
> seems that there are a few tools that could be used...
>
> Pierre Henri.
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 7/3/08, Jon Stelly <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
> From: Jon Stelly <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NHibernate-development] Aligning with Hibernate versioning
> To: "the NHibernate development list" <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 11:20 PM
>
> I'd like to second the wiki idea.  I think API-level documentation is
> great, and I wouldn't want to lose what's there in that CHM file but a Wiki
> where we could better capture some guidance, examples, etc... would go a
> long way to making NHibernate easier to learn for beginners.  I've also had
> the same thought "I'd like to expand on this description a bit" but I don't
> have the motivation to download source and submit a patch (call me lazy).
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 2008/7/2 Will Shaver <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> What we need is an actual Wikipedia style Wiki for docs. There have been
>>> multiple times while reading the documentation that I've thought, "that's
>>> wrong, and I would fix it right here if I could... but firing up an xml
>>> editor and re-compiling it is too much effort."
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ok you and the community will have it ;)
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
>> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nhibernate-development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nhibernate-development
>>
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nhibernate-development mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nhibernate-development
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Nhibernate-development mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nhibernate-development
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08

_______________________________________________
Nhibernate-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nhibernate-development
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.