Re: Dynamic Mapping

Hello everyone,

after looking into it a little bit more a few other questions has
popped up, I hope it's OK I ask them on the list, if not please direct
me to the appropriate place.

Questions I have at the moment is:

1: Should EntityName include assembly Name (to ease migration of Java
functionality I think not but this might be an NH convention?)

2: Caching today uses (Configuration.SetCacheConcurrencyStrategy(..)
uses Type as parameter but Java uses string, Type doesn't work very
well with Dynamic mapping as the only type is Hashtable. Should it be
rewritten to use strings, or overload to allow strings as well. Just
removing current implementation would brake backwards compatibility.

3: How would I go by sharing my work with someone who has commit
status, start a JIRA task and add the diff there and someone would
take a look? These functions has the effect of me having to change
code a bit every here and there...

4: When I checked out the latest SVN 3-5 test didn't execute properly,
is this expected behavior at the moment?

Thanks for any help :)

Regards,
Andreas

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Andreas Karlsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just a question to someone who might now. Should entity name in NH
> include assembly name if available or not?
>
> I have now been removing assembly name for entity name but this might be wrong?
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am not aware of anyone working on this, so it is certainly welcome.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Andreas Karlsson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> this is my first post to the list so please have some patience ;)
>>>
>>> I would need the dynamic mapping functionality which is available
>>> through java hibernate.
>>>
>>> I've made some changes to NH to get it to work (basically in the
>>> configuration parts) but in the meantime it seems that I broke some
>>> stuff for poco entity mode (basically due to how entity name is
>>> handled and changes needed for dynamic-map entity mode to work without
>>> having a mapped class.
>>>
>>> I just would want to check if there's any point for me working on this
>>> or if someone else is also working on this and that it will be
>>> available in not too long future?
>>>
>>> Otherwise what I would like to do is to get this to work without
>>> having broken test + enabling NH.Linq to work with dynamic map
>>> entities.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>>> challenge
>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>>> prizes
>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
>>> world
>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nhibernate-development mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nhibernate-development
>>
>>
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/