Test coverage
Matthew Mastracci <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:15 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nprof.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tim Wilson wrote: > I'd like to add my voice to the suggestion that line-by-line coverage > would be very useful. Both Microsoft and CompuWare have free downloads > that do profiling, but Nprof could score a first by offering coverage. > > I'd suggest the aim should be to answer the question: "Do my NUnit tests > execute every line?" Sounds good to me. We've got line-by-line profiling on the menu for post 1.0 releases. Once we have that down, coverage is easy. > This might be presented as a report that lists every method that > contains unexecuted lines, with the ability to drill down to a report > that shows precisely which lines were not executed. > > If only I had the knowledge to do this myself... > Thanks for a great tool! No problem. Thanks for the suggestions, Matt. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn