Re: Test case terminology (Kelly Anderson)

"Charlie Poole" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel
Message-ID <001101c86e66$bd70b960$7801a8c0@ferrari>
Hi Kelly, 

> The Theory nomenclature is internally consistent, and in this 
> context superior. The downside is that it's not backwards 
> compatible into the NUnit 2.x name space.

As you know, I'm not sold on the Theory nomenclature for this
use. However, it's clear we will have to introduce new 
terminology if we create something that works differently.

It seems to me that doing so is what allows us to be 
backward compatible, while changing how TestFixture/Test
works might be considered incompatible.

Charlie



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.