Re: Test case terminology (Kelly Anderson)
"Charlie Poole" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001101c86e66$bd70b960$7801a8c0@ferrari> |
Hi Kelly, > The Theory nomenclature is internally consistent, and in this > context superior. The downside is that it's not backwards > compatible into the NUnit 2.x name space. As you know, I'm not sold on the Theory nomenclature for this use. However, it's clear we will have to introduce new terminology if we create something that works differently. It seems to me that doing so is what allows us to be backward compatible, while changing how TestFixture/Test works might be considered incompatible. Charlie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/