Re: Fwd: Fwd: Assume
"Vaughn, Clifton" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C1A113F58C449C43AD6FB79FCEF64CDA0681865C@dsp62mail.na.bestbuy.com> |
I don't think it needs to cause an error, but it should signal that the data didn't meet the assumptions unless along with the data you included a flag to signal when an error should be thrown. Either a signature like this: Check.That(meetsAssumptions, 2+2, Is.EqualTo(data) ) Or meetsAssumptions is added as a condition. Thanks cliff -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie Poole Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [nunit-developer] Fwd: Fwd: Assume Hi Kelly, > > [cliff] How about "Check" > > I could live with that. :-) > > Check.IsTrue(...) > Check.That(...) > > Those work. So you guys are saying that Check.That( 2+2, Is.EqualTo(5) ); and Check.IsTrue( 2+2 == 5 ); would cause a test to return without error? Am I the only one who finds that odd? :-) Charlie ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ nunit-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nunit-developer ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/