Re: Fwd: Fwd: Assume

"Bisson-Coulombe, Stephane" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel
Message-ID <5C889913FF236E4190093AF280AB4EC4D3D14E61@wwlkfmail1.wonderware.com>
What if it returns and the test is flagged as "not run" with the reason that was specified by the user.

Technically speaking, the "checks" or "assumptions" could throw a specialized type of exception in order to gracefully stop the execution.

Stéphane

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie Poole
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 1:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nunit-developer] Fwd: Fwd: Assume

Hi Kelly,

> > [cliff] How about "Check"
>
> I could live with that. :-)
>
> Check.IsTrue(...)
> Check.That(...)
>
> Those work.

So you guys are saying that
   Check.That( 2+2, Is.EqualTo(5) );
and
   Check.IsTrue( 2+2 == 5 );

would cause a test to return without error?

Am I the only one who finds that odd? :-)

Charlie



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
nunit-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nunit-developer



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.