Re: Fwd: Fwd: Assume

Hi Kelly, 

> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >  I think it (again) depends on what it's being used for.
> >
> >  If the idea is to automatically generate a few hundred random  
> > numbers to feed to a test, I wouldn't want the gui to list  
> the tests 
> > for numbers that were never used as not run. I'd  want the tests to 
> > never have been generate in the first place.
> 
> Whether they were generated underneath or not is independent 
> of whether they show up in the GUI. You might simply not list 
> the runs where the preconditions were not met.

Three problems with that...

1) Every UI would need to have that logic
2) The UIs would need to know whether to list them as not run or not
list them at all.
3) (The biggie) The GUI has already listed them before they are run

Are we miscommunicating here around the question of test-load time
versus test-run time?

Charlie

> >  But in other situations, it might make sense to show the  skipped 
> > test.
> 
> The only thing I can think of is if you wanted to know if 
> your Assume.That was working properly... which might be worthwhile.
 
> -Kelly
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all 
> challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> nunit-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nunit-developer
> 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/