Re: Extension Points in NUnit 2.5

Hi Kelly, 

> >  I think this would be easy to implement in 2.5 and a more 
> granular  
> > approach could be considered in 3.0, because of some other 
> changes  I 
> > see making.
> 
> Ok, that makes sense. Do you want the dependency expressed at 
> the Fixture level, or the Assembly level, or some other 
> level? If you did express the dependency at the Fixture 
> level, then you could run the tests from the other fixtures. 
> Same for the assembly. I'm thinking on behalf of people who 
> might have large slow test suites that run at night, and they 
> wouldn't want to come in in the AM and find that none of the 
> tests that take 9 hours to run passed.

A good point. Bear in mind, of course, that this would likely
only happen right after installing a new server. With proper
use of a source code repository, even that shouldn't happen.

So while the results are really bad, the probability of 
the problem arisin seem relatively low.

That said, I'll see about implementing it so it can be used
at any level, for those who want to use it that way.

> >  > Seems like a fairly reasonable compromise. I won't stop  
> > thinking 
> > about ways to make things better though. :-)
> >
> >  I'd expect no less. :-)
> 
> Thank you. I'll take that as a compliment. :-)

As intended.

Charlie

> 
> -Kelly
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all 
> challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> nunit-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nunit-developer
> 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/