Re: Fwd: Addin SetUp question
"Charlie Poole" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <009801c87d76$9d8178a0$6401a8c0@ferrari> |
Hi Kelly, > > I'm thinking of allowing all tests to have children and > > dropping TestCase from the hierarchy. A new TestCase > > class would be used as a child of a TestMethod and would > > represent the execution of the method with one set of > arguments. > > > > Comments? > > My only comment is that the entire hierarchy is kind of > under-documented, which makes it difficult to come up to > speed on things and make intelligent comments... ;-) Well, it is internal... but OTOH I did ask for comments. :-) Then again, this list does include people who work with NUnit internals, so I'm glad I asked. > Would there be any backwards compatibility issues with > current plugins should you drop TestCase? Seems like that > would make it hard to make one plugin that worked with all > versions, wouldn't it? In theory, there could be. However, these are intended as NUnit internal implementation details. The way to write one plugin that works across multiple versions is to stick to the interfaces. That's just a bit hard to do right now. > -Kelly > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all > challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > nunit-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nunit-developer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/