Re: Fwd: Data-driven Tests in NUnit 2.5

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Charlie Poole
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Kelly,
>  >  I can see that this is the case. The "requirement" that you
>  > proposed  was to have type safety. If we don't have type
>  > safety now, why require  it for a future feature? Or do you
>  > achieve type safety on some level  now that you want to maintain?
>
>  Yes.

Ok.

>  >  I'm trying to understand the motivation behind the request
>  > for type  safety in the implementation of Theory data sources.
>
>  I think I see where this discussion has gotten off track.
>
>  I wasn't intending to establish a "requirement" or even make a
>  "request." I merely made a statement of how I intended to
>  proceed with my own programming experiments. I really didn't
>  anticipate debating about it.
>
>  And again: I'm talking about data-driven tests not Theory.

This isn't a debate. I just don't know how to achieve it. I suppose I
should just wait and see what you come up with. I was simply trying to
noodle it out for myself, but with no luck thus far.

-Kelly

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/