Re: NUnit 2.5: What's In It Now

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Charlie Poole
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think one of the weaknesses of my approach is that the Assumes aren't
> inline with the code, but if we want to also think of theory explorers, we
> may want to "advertise" our assumptions in a different way, so that the
> tools can build up the datasets more intelligently?
>
> Interesting idea.

If I didn't say so before, I think this is an interesting idea too...
The question remains whether that can just as easily be extracted from
the meta-data and p-code.

> That's the diff between an experiment and a release - or so I've learned -
> if you put functionality
> into a release, you're pretty much stuck with it. :-)

I can see why you don't want Theory in 2.5 on that basis for sure!! :-)

I'm hoping Gary and I can come up with an Addin for playing around
with the ideas though.

-Kelly

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone