Re: StreamsEqual issue(s)
"Gert Driesen" <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:02:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey Charlie, I did make a few changes to the NAnt "install" target and the generated nant script to have it align better with linux packaging practices: http://nant.cvs.sourceforge.net/nant/nant/NAnt.build?r1=1.246&r2=1.250 http://nant.cvs.sourceforge.net/nant/nant/Makefile?r1=1.19&r2=1.20 For info on the way DESTDIR is used for creating staged installs, see: http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/DESTDIR.html Gert -----Original Message----- From: Charlie Poole [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: donderdag 14 augustus 2008 2:18 To: 'Gert Driesen'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [nunit-developer] StreamsEqual issue(s) Hi Gert, > I think it's sufficient to document this (and add a unit test > for the behavior with non-readable and/or non-seekable streams). Will do... > > I suggest running your same tests with the 2.5 alpha to see > if there > > are any further problems. I suspect there will not be, but I can > > easily fix any incompatibilities there. > > I could consider this, but I doubt a patch to upgrade to an > alpha version of NUnit will be accepted. No... I just meant that you could find out if there are added issues with 2.5 or if the amount of work is likely to be the same. I wouldn't suggest you patch until at least a beta. :-) And if I knew about issues before release, they might get resolved sooner. > Perhaps the other issues I found are also just broken tests. > If I recall correctly one was about comparing floats. Pass them to me as you find them and I'll be glad to look them over. Better yet, file bugs on them so we can keep track. > > > In fact, fixing anything that made it easier to use NUnit in Mono > > > would be a big priority. > > > > BTW, do you think I should have some sort of install for linux? > > Up to now it has been totally left to the packagers. > > Yeah, probably. For NAnt, the Novell team creates RPMs. But I > think each open-source project should take care of this > themselves to avoid becoming dependent on the goodwill and > schedule of Novell. > > For NAnt, the problem was that I did not know enough about > linux packaging, and did not have enough time (or interest) > to look into it. That's about were I am, except I'm somewhat interested, so I may try to make the time to learn about it at some point. Of course, if someone reading this has the knowledge, time and interest, I hope they'll make themselves known. :-) Charlie > Gert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/