Re: Comparing the various ways to run tests
"Brad Stiles" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> There are several advantages (but no hard & fast rules) for separating your > unit test code from your application code (if that is indeed what you are asking): Unfortunately, it wasn't, but you gave a good synopsis of why I use a separate assembly to contain the tests, just as you do. :) When I run NUnit, either the GUI or the console runner, I point it at the (separate) compiled assembly that contains all my tests. Some people apparently point it at a Visual Studio project or solution (which I didn't even realize was an option), while others define an NUnit project, which presumably points to one or more assemblies that contain tests. Having only used the first approach, I was wondering what advantages, or disadvantages, might lie with the latter two approaches. Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/