Re: establishing logical test order?

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Charlie Poole
<[email protected]> wrote:
> More seriously, I do think NUnit needs code-coverage analysis and you can
> expect to see something in NUnit 3.0. I think it's important that the data collection
> and the reporting each be separate, pluggable components, which is what NUnit 3.0
> is all about.

How practical do you think it would be to write a shim to delegate the
profiler API back to C#? (either in the same process different
assembly/appdomain, or in a different process).

Python has profiler that you can easily hook into and use from Python,
and it's super convinent to be able to integrate this directly into
projects easily. I've even built websites where I can put a "&prof=1"
paramater on them and get a full profile trace for that single webpage
on a live running service.

I can imagine it would be slower than unmanaged, and our profiler shim
would need to take care not to introduce recursive behavior, but I
don't see any obvious reason it wouldn't be possible.  This would be a
cool thing to give to the community.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php