Re: NUnit XML Output
"Laimonas Simutis" <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:49:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Aiste Stikliute <[email protected]> wrote: > As for definitions, my definition for "log" is simply test results, just > like Mark's. That's the reason why we suggest modifying TestResults.xml as a > possible solution. I myself see no need for two "log" files. Maybe this > could be a configurable option? For example, my test are neither parallel > nor not completing for a long time... So I choose to use writing > TestResults.xml after each test/fixture. If that causes me problems, I > choose to do it the old way. I will have to disagree here. The log is the log and the test results are the test results. IMO they are two separate things. TestResults.xml is pretty much a summary of the test run. I would focus on a previous conversation which indicated that for this "real-time" logging we need some sort of different mechanism of output where interested parties could look at. You wouldn't need to look at it all the time, (I mean a mysterious test failing out of the sudden is not a usual behavior I would hope) Just my opinion ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/