Re: Is there any truth to this claim: "Keep space on your hard drive"
Mark Levison <mark-r0EpITdELjZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
According to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_Defragmenter_%28Windows%29 - 15% is required to do a full defrag. Is there anything else that could impinged on performance other than contigous files? Cheers Mark On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Herb Warren <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Mark Levison<mark-r0EpITdELjZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]<mark%40mlevison.com>> > wrote: > > I see it made frequently in the photographic world - yet it seems to be > > complete BS to me. I can understand a warning that you should keep 10-20 > GB > > but - 40%? Why. > > 40% seems high - OTOH, defrag s/w frequently requires (or works better > with) around 30% free, so it's not completely unreasonable. If you > assume the boot disk is also the home of %TEMP% and %TMP%, pagefiles, > etc, then maybe you can justify the free space. I tend to move all of > the above off the system drive. > > Herb. > >