Re: Is there any truth to this claim: "Keep space on your hard drive"

Mark Levison <mark-r0EpITdELjZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.off-topic
Message-ID <[email protected]>
According to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_Defragmenter_%28Windows%29 - 15% is
required to do a full defrag. Is there anything else that could impinged on
performance other than contigous files?

Cheers
Mark

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Herb Warren <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Mark Levison<mark-r0EpITdELjZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]<mark%40mlevison.com>>
> wrote:
> > I see it made frequently in the photographic world - yet it seems to be
> > complete BS to me. I can understand a warning that you should keep 10-20
> GB
> > but - 40%? Why.
>
> 40% seems high - OTOH, defrag s/w frequently requires (or works better
> with) around 30% free, so it's not completely unreasonable. If you
> assume the boot disk is also the home of %TEMP% and %TMP%, pagefiles,
> etc, then maybe you can justify the free space. I tend to move all of
> the above off the system drive.
>
> Herb.
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.