Re: Not with a bang, but with a whimper
Mike <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I could not agree with Rob Conery more about WebMatrix: http://blog.wekeroad.com/microsoft/someone-hit-their-head <http://blog.wekeroad.com/microsoft/someone-hit-their-head>I'm worried that MS will pull WebMatrix once they realize that everyone has been looking for a stepping stone down from VS, not a stepping stone up to it. And here is an interesting complaint about .NET MVC not being granular enough: http://www.garann.com/dev/2010/model-view-controller-and-roomy-clothes/ Mike On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > And Razor/WebMatrix is perhaps an even better combo? Perhaps even something truly great? > After several months of coding purely in javascript /notepad++, I have no desire whatsoever to fire up Visual Studio and get involved with a lot of generic angle brackets. It looks awfully noisy. But WebMatrix, SQL, and dynamic C# sounds like everything you could need to be seriously productive. I played around with it for an hour and it was plenty fast and sweet. > Mike > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Scott Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Razor / MVC is a great combination - don't even think about using aspx views. If you've studied RoR I think you'll find the learning curve is relatively flat. >> >> --s >> >> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> What is looking nicer is MVC with Razor. I wonder if anyone has anything to say about it, and what is the learning curve for developers who are already very familiar with ASP.NET 2.0? I personally have been doing non-software work almost this whole past year, but I did study RoR, which made me less excited to go back to web forms. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>