Re: Best Scripting Environment Ever. Best Desktop Technology Ever.
"Bill" <billa-l3pLR9/iSOgztatW0fm/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There are HTML Applications (.HTA) that have access to local resources. In fact the Windows Add/Remote Control Panel applet used to be (still is?) implemented as an HTA. --- In [email protected], Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu@...> wrote: > > I thought JavaScript was limited to browsing activities. It would be terribly > unsecure if a script off the web could access your computer. > > Alan Baljeu > > > > ________________________________ > From: Kim Gräsman <kim.grasman@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 1:11:49 AM > Subject: Re: [OT] Best Scripting Environment Ever. Best Desktop Technology Ever. > > > Synchronicity. I just used JavaScript with WSH the other day to do > some shell + automation scripting. Then again, I think it's nice > mostly in the sense that it's always available on Windows boxes, I > never have to worry about prerequisites. > > - Kim > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 01:27, Mike <michael.net@...> wrote: > > IE (even as far back as 5.0) + HTML + JavaScript + > > Scripting.FileSystemObject on Windows. > > > > It has been right under our noses all these years. Just like AJAX was. > > > > I used to do ASP.NET, but now I do a lot of work on very walled off, > > locked down systems, and am often in need of a scripting language. > > Usually I end up doing something "creative". But recently I had the > > good fortune of being truly checkmated. I had only a very walled off > > Windows 2003 machine to work with. But this turned out to be great > > because instead of loading Powershell or Visual Studio, it forced me > > to try writing a utility using JavaScript and HTML. It was > > outstandingly productive. Is there any simpler *desktop* UI > > technology than HTML in a browser? And any more powerful scripting > > language than JavaScript? How could I have missed this all these > > years? > > > > It is amazing how far backwards we went with ASP.NET, WPF etc. >