Re: Dead Zune Club
Adwait Ullal <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:08:36 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF1q1WdgoEMKmyxzwi=f00thOtAJ0WWzWNcKLPUee6_z7pk_yw@mail.gmail.com> |
>As far as TSQL, it is very Microsofty/VBish. Noisy, cutesy, and lacks basic functionality like TRANSLATE. Not that PL/SQL is anything to brag about. T-SQL came with Sybase, from whom Microsoft had colloborated on SQL Server 4.x. Pre-dates VB and/or Microsoft ... just saying. - Adwait -- Adwait Ullal w: http://www.adwait.com p: (408) 898-2581 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > Like most MS products, it is too clickly. here is always one or two too > many clicks necessary to do just about anything, which sounds trivial but > gets annoying fast. For example with toad if you want to see data from a > table, you just click on the tablename. Probably the biggest continual > annoyance is having to exactly select the portion of SQL that you wish to > run. Toad had several more highly convenient options, and you only had to > have the cursor located somewhere in the block. I have to use the mouse > more often with smss. Then other small things, but that get annoying, like > not remembering which windows you want to have open on start up. > > As far as TSQL, it is very Microsofty/VBish. Noisy, cutesy, and lacks > basic functionality like TRANSLATE. Not that PL/SQL is anything to brag > about. > > One thing I do like, is the sproc debugging. > > Some of my complaints are not fair. I recently spent several months using > almost nothing except notepad++, and now I'm expecting all editors to have > things like sophisticated column mode editing, etc. > > Mike > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Chris Wuestefeld < > chris-/ffxFymC14jQ7bhM+Ce/[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> > SSMS is terrible compared to Toad/Oracle, I wonder if there is >> something else that is solid that I should switch to?**** >> >> While I haven’t seen Toad in a decade (when it was a freeware third party >> app), I’m really surprised to hear you say that it’s superior to SSMS. I’m >> curious what innovations they’ve made. Can you fill us in?**** >> >> There are a few add-ins for SSMS that I find indispensable:**** >> >> *SQL Prompt* (Redgate). This does Intellisense for queries. But not just >> filling in the names of columns. It can also help to automatically fill in >> the ON conditions for JOINs, for example.**** >> >> *SSMS Tools* (freeware, http://www.ssmstoolspack.com/). A bunch of >> features, but the important ones to me are:**** >> >> **· **Automatically saves every query you issue, ever, and allows >> you to search through history to find old ones.**** >> >> **· **Provides a colored bar next to your query window, with a >> color specified for each server you connect to. I use this to show green >> (“safe”) for DEV servers, and red (“danger”) for Production servers.**** >> >> **· **Automatically generate INSERT statements for the data >> actually in a table.**** >> >> *SQL Search* (freeware, Redgate). Helps you locate specific entities or >> stored procs. Very helpful in a large database.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> > >