Re: Sh

on the off topic linux thing yes quiet a few former litestep users are
now  linux users and i for one miss LS bad it is in fact the only
thing i really miss from windows. I love to see it ported, to point me
in the direction need to start myself.

josh=20
verbalshadow

On 4/26/05, Chris Sutcliffe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Welcome to the list Stan!
>=20
> > Here's hoping!  I noticed the archives weren't very busy - I wonder if
> > this is because no-one's interested in replacement shells anymore?
>=20
> The list has it's ups and downs, unfortunately, it's been on a downward
> trend recently.  ilm posted a little bit a while back, but unfortunately,
> he's disappeared again (if memory serves he was busy with Real Life).
>=20
> Unfortunately, the interest in alt. shells also seems to have cooled off
> as well (guess a lot of people are on the Linux bandwagon).
>=20
> As for solving undocumented calls (and/or understanding some of the
> archaic win32 calls) I'm all for it.  A pet project of mine is trying to
> get SetShellWindow and SetShellWindowEx to work nicely with using Windows
> Explorer as a file manager.  That's what actually sparked the
> SHChangeNotifyRegister discussion, since windows doesn't refresh the
> 'save' dialogs when an application other than explorer sets itself as the
> shell window (using the SetShellWindow function).
>=20
> Cheers!
>=20
> Chris
> _______________
> Chris Sutcliffe
> [email protected]
> http://www.emergedesktop.org
> http://ironhead.modblog.com
>=20
>=20
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
>=20
>

__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding