Re: Flight from Twisted Vista (was Re: Ok. Heh, is there still...)

Alexander Vermaat <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Noooooo, did we loose yet another to Linux? :(

Personally I can't stand KDE or anything that stats with K.

Mattias Westlund wrote:
> After all this Linux vs Windows talk here lately I went ahead and 
> installed openSUSE on my machine. It's a dual boot though, I still 
> have XP installed, but I've spent the most part of the latest two days 
> in Linux. And I must say that I like it, I could very well imagine 
> becoming a full-time Linux user eventually. Sure, there's a lot of 
> stuff you have to learn and re-learn, but it doesn't feel quite as 
> hopless as when I've played around with Linux in the past. Maybe it's 
> because openSUSE is a distro that suits me, or maybe it's just that 
> I'm so sick of Windows ATM that I welcome the change.
>
> So far almost everything is working smoothly -- I've managed to get 
> Photoshop 7 running under Wine and it seems to work pretty good. Looks 
> awful though, with that Win 95 color scheme, but maybe that can be 
> changed somehow (the msstyles support in Wine seems more than a little 
> flaky). I've installed UT 2004 and Jedi Academy and I was surprised to 
> find that game performance in Linux is frigging excellent. I actually 
> get better performance in UT2004 under Linux than I get with UT99 in 
> Windows; my framerate is soaring even though everything's on max and I 
> have AA and Anisotropy set pretty high :) So that was a pleasant 
> surprise.
>
> As for Cubase SX, I fear that there's no chance I'll be able to use 
> it. It might /run/ under Wine, but from what I've gathered it's not 
> going to be very useful as Wine lacks the advanced audio support 
> Cubase requires. It won't let the app communicate directly with the 
> hardware, and thus you'll get very high audio latencies. So even if I 
> decide jo jump in and migrate to Linux I will have to keep a windows 
> installation around for music making and gaming. Which maybe isn't a 
> bad idea after all; that way I could really optimize and streamline 
> the Windows install for those tasks and those tasks only.
>
> There's a number of small things that bother me about Linux though and 
> I have hundreds of questions to ask. But maybe this is not the place. 
> However, one thing that (oddly enough) does *not* bother me much is 
> the UI/custo bit. At this point at least I feel that KDE has pretty 
> much everything I need in terms of interface looks and functionality 
> and I really don't miss LS much. So even if LS was ported to Linux, I 
> really don't see myself using it as KDE is good enough for me and lets 
> me set everything up without touching a single config file.
>
> So... thanks everyone. This discussion finally made me install Linux. 
> Now I'm gonna go figure out how the heck to import my Thunderbird 
> profile so I don't have to reboot into Windows to check and send 
> emails :)
>
> /West
>
>
> tin_omen wrote:
>> This thread seems to have taken on an undead life of it's own. Time 
>> to change my original subject to something more accurate...
>>
>> Funny how timely a subject this is, as it's what I've been kicking 
>> around for the last few months, as well. Heck a group of us were 
>> standing around discussing exactly this subject in our messaging IT 
>> group just last week.
>>
>> Like quite a few people in here, I make a living supporting M$ 
>> infrastructure (last 12yrs+). It's the demon I know, and I've made a 
>> decent living doing it. But having said that, I've got zero interest 
>> in shifting any of the five XP machines we have at home to Vista 
>> (wife & I's Dell laptops, an HP video/podcast/torrent DL box, an old 
>> P3-650 Micron that does low & slow vid-compression, and our 
>> SageTV-based hometheather box).
>>
>> -I don't like the DRM/HDCP/AACS or paying a vendor that's repeatedly 
>> demonstrated they aim to serve 3rd-parties interests over me, the 
>> paying customer. I built a SageTV htpc a yr ago to replace my 
>> lifetime-subscr TiVo (once it dies) for the same reasons. Gotta love 
>> the potential for vista "killing" an entire range of hardware that 
>> becomes "suspect" simply to suit the insecurities of the HD-DVD folk.
>>
>> -I don't like the new licensing limited lifespan (Per M$ only RETAIL 
>> copies of Vista are transferable to your next home-built computer, 
>> and then, only _ONCE_. Prepare to weedle M$ for new keys, down the road)
>>
>> -For Gaming: I've got an Xbox360 & PS/2 that I play games on these 
>> days (and a Gamefly sub to keep them stocked) -- haven't run a game 
>> on my main box since I last fired up VTM:bloodlines a year or so ago. 
>> Without the need to continuously upgrade my hardware to play new game 
>> releases, and no need to try to "buy" better multiplayer performance 
>> against other players by buying more hardware (360 is a pretty 
>> "level" playing field), a big part of my last ten years of upgrade 
>> rat race are now gone. "Improved" Gaming OS support was the only 
>> reason I upgraded from 98se to XP when I finally made that change -- 
>> well after most folks, as I recall.:D
>>
>> -HDTV: I don't own an HDTV -- 99% of my tv viewing is sourced on an 
>> old sdtv Tivo. And I have no interest in watching HD on my pc or 
>> laptop. Not to mention with vista's DRM, I _really_ would have 
>> reasons not to. I do enough quick DVD viewing, while 
>> authoring/ripping discs that I know it's a pain in the ass to watch a 
>> movie at the range of a couple of feet.
>>
>> -Media-support: I'll NEVER run MCE for any home theater -- my brother 
>> does, but he has lower expectations and does substantially less with 
>> the box.:D SageTV (which is available for Linux) outputs all of it's 
>> recordings in friendly non-drm avi format. Ready to 
>> burn/archive/remix, whatever. Heck even my Squeezebox mp3-headunit 
>> can run it's backend just dandy under linux! And it offloads the 
>> mem-footprint onto a background server, where it won't impact TV 
>> recording.
>>
>> So, I'm actually at the point now that our next home desktop OS after 
>> XP will not be on a M$ platform. There's alot of technical folks I 
>> respect that run Linux/*nix servers and Mac desktops, and Linux has 
>> always been a possibility, not to mention it doesn't require 
>> replacing any hardware or buying all new software.
>>
>> The meat and potatoes of my daily computer use can be done with any 
>> OS (firefox, tbird, & sub in OpenOfc for excel & word). So, which 
>> apps really 'tie' me to XP: Photoshop, and some convenience tools 
>> that would be nice to have on-hand.
>>
>> And that's where virtualization comes in: Due to cisco-vpn 
>> restrictions in my firm's client, several months ago I started 
>> running all of my work vpn-access out of a canned little xp vmware 
>> session on my xp box's desktop. It does everything I need, is 
>> low-overhead, and lets cisco's little fascist config believe that the 
>> rest of the world is 'locked out', while I'm accessing work... while 
>> I continue to surf the web and my home-life goes blissfully on in the 
>> background.
>>
>>  From there, I had no choice but to pull down a free copy of vmware 
>> server and install it on one of my servers (which had little else to 
>> do, since it's primary role was as a redundant domain controller, dns 
>> & backup server). So I stocked it with a whole suite of vmware images 
>> of a variety of os's and apps for testing/evaluating/playing-with: 
>> Exchange2007beta, SQL2k5, Mom2k5, a variety of Unices, some odd 
>> Linuxes. Beos. Pretty much anything: if it's not installed yet, I've 
>> probably dug around on the docs and grabbed the necessary isos.:P I 
>> added the vmware server client on my xp box, and that little vpn-xp 
>> vm happily hopped it's load over to the server.
>>
>> Of course, the nifty thing about all this is that I can run vmware 
>> just as well under Linux! Next step is probably going to be 
>> converting the above server to an Ubuntu box.
>>
>> Extending this vm-use, have you guys seen the write-up at 
>> Lifehacker... 
>> (http://lifehacker.com/software/linux/run-windows-apps-on-your-linux-desktop-229832.php), 
>>
>> ... pointing to an article on 2X ApplicationServer for Win Termserv?
>> (http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1238129,00.html) 
>>
>> (http://www.2x.com/applicationserver/)
>>
>> 2XAS has a free download with a perpetual license for a 5-connection 
>> version. This app essentially delivers 'citrix-like' publishing of 
>> apps from out of a background vm right onto your linux desktop, with 
>> the vm-apps appearing as individual app windows. It delivers windows 
>> apps seamlessly into linux! I haven't tried it out yet, but I'm 
>> definitely going to.
>>
>> Beyond the above, for folks hung on Photoshop, there are quite a few 
>> write-ups on getting ps running under Linux with Wine. One I stumbled 
>> across recently was:
>> http://lifehacker.com/software/photoshop/how-to-install-photoshop-on-ubuntu-206827.php 
>>
>>
>> And hey, who runs a linux install with the default interfaces in this 
>> community? We're about tweaking things out! Heh, the first time I 
>> installed slackware, a good 10 years ago, it was to be able to try 
>> out Windowmaker & Enlightenment!:D It's really not that difficult to 
>> tweak out a given distro's interface. As usual. Google is your friend.:D
>>
>> Todd
>> tin_omen
>>
>> todd kadrie  |  tin_omen-gfZTEr3/[email protected] |  desktopian.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.