Re: Next steps forward?
"Antoine W. Campagna" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
funny : <litestep-HzvBz7w1J3cIFlVeWT/[email protected]>: ezmlm-reject: fatal: Sorry, I don't accept messages larger than 30000 bytes (#5.2.3) my message at the end... On 8/13/07, Antoine W. Campagna <AntoineW-/[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8/13/07, Roy Gathercoal <[email protected]> wrote: > snip snip Wendy, I thank you for the compliment but no, I don't want to be > > president. Am enjoying life without a bullseye painted > > on my back. . .("Hell of a birthmark, eh?") > > > > > (And yes, I know I haven't gotten back with the problems I've had with > > LS on > > > Vista - work and life and kids going back to school...I don't have the > > > luxury to have my computer acting wonky for an extended period of > > time.) > > > > > > ~Wendy Harlow > > > Tonsei-rs > > > > > > > Dude, you write long texts. But it's > good suff, quite inspiring. You almost got me quitting my job and devoting myself to improving and promoting LS, hehe. > You should try politics or something. > > I may have skipped a few lines of your message but I think you are quite > right. If we want to share our goodness, we must be a bit more proactive. > > LS has a great history behind it. I takes good ideas that come from Job's > NextStep OS plus a few other shells and it has improvedover time to the > beatiful design we have today. > > LS is currently (and IMO has been for a few years) a stable > platform that can be used to do many great things. I also believe this has been proven already by LDE(X) and many revolutionary themes. > > LS no longer impresses the masses > because not many people are looking for explorer replacement these days and > there is much eye candy stuff available on the net. But no shell or > eye candy app is as complete/powerful/polished as LS is. This > should be advertised a bit more. We need something that will impress on its own but that let the people know that much more is available. > > > But LS is not for the masses. Yes, a neophyte can benefit from LS > but the thing is that most computer users don't want to learn, they don't like to learn they just use the computer for a few simple things (web > and mail) and don't care about anything else. > > But the niche market is significant. > Most graphic designers (that work on MSW), many developers, most hobbyists/modders, many gamers and others > would be happy to have a LS based custom shell. > > What I'll try to do is to contact my graphic designer friends and see if > they can design a shell interface that I would then use as the basis for a > new theme (all themes I make are either ugly or a ripoff of someone else's > work). I am also available for module/core development/debugging. > > Antoine > >